The regulator alleged that J had been aggressive towards a patient and also failed to deliver the standard of care expected. An interim suspension order was sought. Rebecca challenged the cogency of the regulator’s evidence on the basis that it was incomplete and only showed a narrow section of the alleged incident, which was also contradicted by evidence that the patient had been abusive and posed a serious risk to J and his colleague. The panel accepted that there were extenuating circumstances and that both the public protection and public interest grounds could be served by a conditions of practice order.