M faced allegations of sexual harassment and the regulator sought an interim suspension order. Following detailed analysis of the evidence and inherent flaws, Khaled successfully argued that the regulators case was not cogent and that an interim order was therefore not appropriate. The panel accepted the submissions and concluded that no order was necessary.
Interim order hearing – no order
Khaled Hussain-Dupré
Cases
Author
Khaled Hussain-Dupré
Category
Cases
Date
November, 2024
M faced allegations of sexual harassment and the regulator sought an interim suspension order. Following detailed analysis of the evidence
NEWS