A faced allegations of harassment and coercive and controlling behaviour in his private life, with the regulator seeking an interim suspension order. Following a complex review of thousands of social media posts and video, Khaled successfully argued that the evidence advanced by the regulator was not sufficiently cogent to warrant an order and that in any case neither the public protection nor the public interest ground were made out. The panel found that no order was necessary and A is permitted to continue practising without restrictions.