Having been convicted of two offences for non-violent protest, the regulator alleged that C’s fitness to practice was impaired by virtue of the repeated nature of the offences. Following detailed submissions, Khaled successfully argued that the registrant’s fitness to practice was not currently impaired and consequently the case was closed without further action.
Substantive hearing – no impairment
Khaled Hussain-Dupré
Cases
Author
Khaled Hussain-Dupré
Category
Cases
Date
March, 2025
Having been convicted of two offences for non-violent protest, the regulator alleged that C’s fitness to practice was impaired by
NEWS
Related News
K faced allegations of neglecting a patient’s safety and the regulator sought an interim suspension order. Ben highlighted the extensive
Benjamin Bardell
Cases
J faced allegations of low value theft and failing to disclose his fitness to practise case to an employer. J
Benjamin Bardell
Cases
L was alleged to have breached her conditions of practice order by being named as a director of a company.
Khaled Hussain-Dupré
Cases
Khaled successfully argued that the Council’s evidence was insufficient for a panel to find that the registrant had deliberately administered
Khaled Hussain-Dupré
Cases