L was alleged to have breached her conditions of practice order by being named as a director of a company. The regulator sought a suspension order as it alleged that this demonstrated further dishonesty by the registrant. Khaled successfully argued that the registrant did not work for the company as it had no operations and was not trading, and which could not therefore be a breach based on the wording of the conditions. The panel found that there was no breach and there was no need to vary the existing order.