J faced allegations of low value theft and failing to disclose his fitness to practise case to an employer. J provided extensive reflections for the Case Examiners’ consideration, supported by detailed submissions by Ben, outlining why there was no prospect of the case amounting to current impairment. In particular, that there had been no obligation at the relevant stage to disclose the FTP concerns as there was no interim order in place. Accordingly the Case Examiners issued a warning and the case was closed.