Cases

M faced allegations of fraudulent expenses claims totalling more then £70,000 over a number of years. The case involved understanding

A was alleged to have harassed his practice assessor into changing evaluation feedback and regularly logging hours on EPAD. On

S was the subject of an interim suspension order. Putting before the panel the findings of a coroner’s court and

Khaled was recently instructed to defend a BACP member alleged to have used derogatory language on their personal TikTok account.

In a case dating back almost nine years, J, a paramedic decided to change representation part way through the hearing.

A was alleged to have made various clinical and recording errors in two different settings, and also dishonesty, dating back

Following the conclusion of a local investigation, N sought an early review of their interim order. Ben successfully argued that

Facing serious allegations of misconduct, after over a year of investigation, the regulator made an application for an interim order.

S, a paramedic, was alleged to have acted dishonestly in relation to signing off a trainee’s portfolio. Although S accepted

Khaled successfully argued that the Council’s evidence was insufficient for a panel to find that the registrant had deliberately administered